Evaluation Questions
1.
Were the participants honest with themselves?
Always. I believe
for the most part the she was honest with herself,
2.
Were their opinions bases on facts or personal
experiences?
Kayleigh relied on facts as well
as personal opinions
3.
Did they revise judgment when new evidence
arose?
Sometimes.
4.
Were they an emotional debater following their
feelings and acting impulsively?
Sometimes, she was
passionate, but knew how to use it to make a point, but not overly so, that she
couldn’t see other opinions.
5.
Did they hold a firm stance on their position or
was it weak?
Firm. She knew
what she was talking about but used additional information to her advantage
6.
Was participant willing to listen to both side
of the story?
Sometimes. She was
willing to listen to up until a point, but usually reverted back to her own
opinion.
7.
Did they dismiss problems as a nuisance and a
threat to their ego or not?
Never. She seemed
able to take the conversation into a pleasant(ish) area.
8.
Are they interested in other people ideas?
Sometimes. She
would listen to the question, and sometimes-new information or opinions would
change her view.
9.
Do they seek a fair balanced view striving for
understanding?
Always.
10. The
participant demonstrates the three values of critical thinking interpretation,
investigation, and judgment?
Sometimes.
She had her own (positive) view on the average person’s ability to have a gun but
was able to listen to other opinions although most of the time “stuck to her
guns”
Overall I think that Kayleigh is a Critical thinker but
could stand to take more opinions into consideration.
No comments:
Post a Comment