Evaluation Questions
1.
Were the participants honest with themselves?
Always. I believe
for the most part the she was honest with herself, however undecided about her
official position on the matter.
2.
Were their opinions bases on facts or personal
experiences?
Always personal experience. During
the interview she relied mostly on personal experiences referencing people in
her life.
3.
Did they revise judgment when new evidence
arose?
Sometimes. When presented with different ways to handle gun control and
situations but was not very optimistic about opposing evidence.
4.
Were they an emotional debater following their
feelings and acting impulsively?
Always. When I
started questioning her views she became very dismissive and started
questioning me.
5.
Did they hold a firm stance on their position or
was it weak?
Weak. Her position
on the issue was very mixed and at various times started contradicting herself.
6.
Was participant willing to listen to both side
of the story?
Sometimes. She was
willing to listen to up until a point, but sort of instantly went against the
ideas presented.
7.
Did they dismiss problems as a nuisance and a
threat to their ego or not?
Always. Became
very defensive and started questioning my stance on the issue.
8.
Are they interested in other people ideas?
Sometimes. She
would listen to the question, but that was new information did not change her
opinion.
9.
Do they seek a fair balanced view striving for
understanding?
Never. Went straight to arguing
every point presented and was pretty bias and one sided.
10. The
participant demonstrates the three values of critical thinking interpretation,
investigation, and judgment?
No comments:
Post a Comment